November 2024 S M T W T F S 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 Archives
- July 2020
- May 2020
- April 2020
- March 2020
- September 2014
- May 2014
- September 2013
- May 2013
- April 2013
- December 2012
- January 2012
- November 2011
- May 2011
- March 2011
- February 2011
- September 2010
- February 2010
- January 2010
- December 2009
- November 2009
- October 2009
- September 2009
- July 2009
- June 2009
- April 2009
- November 2008
- October 2008
- September 2008
- July 2008
- June 2008
- May 2008
- April 2008
- March 2008
- August 2006
- July 2006
- September 2005
Categories
- A2K3
- anaphylaxis
- Berkman
- Berkman Lunch Series
- Book Reviews
- Conferences
- Developing world
- Diary
- Economics
- Fascinating People
- Film
- health
- Human Rights
- Intellectual Property
- Internet and Democracy
- Law
- Law
- Machine Learning
- Media
- Middle East
- Open Data
- Open Science
- OSTP
- Peer Review
- personal
- Reproducible Research
- Scientific Method
- shameless self-promotion
- Software
- Startups
- Statistics
- Talks
- Technology
- Uncategorized
- Women's rights
Category Archives: Peer Review
Regulatory steps toward open science and reproducibility: we need a science cloud
This past January Obama signed the America COMPETES Re-authorization Act. It contains two interesting sections that advance the notions of open data and the federal role in supporting online access to scientific archives: 103 and 104, which read in part: … Continue reading
Generalize clinicaltrials.gov and register research hypotheses before analysis
Stanley Young is Director of Bioinformatics at the National Institute for Statistical Sciences, and gave a talk in 2009 on problems in modern scientific research. For example: 1 in 20 NIH-funded studies actually replicates; closed data and opacity; model selection … Continue reading
Open peer review of science: a possibility
The Nature journal Molecular Systems Biology published an editorial “From Bench to Website” explaining their move to a transparent system of peer review. Anonymous referee reports, editorial decisions, and author responses are published alongside the final published paper. When this … Continue reading
Posted in Open Science, Peer Review, Reproducible Research, Technology
3 Comments