http://blog.stodden.net/2009/12/28/post-2-the-ostp%e2%80%99s-call-for-comments-regarding-public-access-policies-for-science-and-technology-funding-agencies-across-the-federal-government/ Just another WordPress weblog Mon, 17 May 2010 01:59:26 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1 http://blog.stodden.net/2009/12/28/post-2-the-ostp%e2%80%99s-call-for-comments-regarding-public-access-policies-for-science-and-technology-funding-agencies-across-the-federal-government/comment-page-1/#comment-716 ISP Fellow Comments on the OSTP’s Public Access Policies for Science and Technology Funding Agencies – Post 3 : Information Society Project at Yale Law School Wed, 20 Jan 2010 18:49:03 +0000 http://blog.stodden.net/?p=144#comment-716 [...] on implementation issues. The second wave requested input on Features and Technology (our post is here). For the third and final wave on Management, Chris Wiggins, Matt Knepley, and I posted the [...] [...] on implementation issues. The second wave requested input on Features and Technology (our post is here). For the third and final wave on Management, Chris Wiggins, Matt Knepley, and I posted the [...]

]]> http://blog.stodden.net/2009/12/28/post-2-the-ostp%e2%80%99s-call-for-comments-regarding-public-access-policies-for-science-and-technology-funding-agencies-across-the-federal-government/comment-page-1/#comment-715 Victoria Stodden Thu, 07 Jan 2010 20:15:07 +0000 http://blog.stodden.net/?p=144#comment-715 [...] on implementation issues. The second wave requested input on Features and Technology (our post is here). For the third and final wave on Management, Chris Wiggins, Matt Knepley, and I posted the [...] [...] on implementation issues. The second wave requested input on Features and Technology (our post is here). For the third and final wave on Management, Chris Wiggins, Matt Knepley, and I posted the [...]

]]> http://blog.stodden.net/2009/12/28/post-2-the-ostp%e2%80%99s-call-for-comments-regarding-public-access-policies-for-science-and-technology-funding-agencies-across-the-federal-government/comment-page-1/#comment-714 vcs Sat, 02 Jan 2010 02:14:21 +0000 http://blog.stodden.net/?p=144#comment-714 My sense is that the burden of Open Access on scientists needs to be minimized but there are some aspects, such as reproducibility and development of code others can reuse successfully, where scientists may find it beneficial to adapt their workflow. There is a great course on this, <a href=http://software-carpentry.org/ rel="nofollow">http://software-carpentry.org/</a> ;) (It's Greg's course). The discussion on the OSTP blog on Tools for Open Access was lighter than the one of Implementation, but they are scheduling a 2 week open discussion starting January 7 and this question might be raised then. It's a good one. My sense is that the burden of Open Access on scientists needs to be minimized but there are some aspects, such as reproducibility and development of code others can reuse successfully, where scientists may find it beneficial to adapt their workflow. There is a great course on this, http://software-carpentry.org/ (It’s Greg’s course). The discussion on the OSTP blog on Tools for Open Access was lighter than the one of Implementation, but they are scheduling a 2 week open discussion starting January 7 and this question might be raised then. It’s a good one.

]]> http://blog.stodden.net/2009/12/28/post-2-the-ostp%e2%80%99s-call-for-comments-regarding-public-access-policies-for-science-and-technology-funding-agencies-across-the-federal-government/comment-page-1/#comment-713 Greg Wilson Tue, 29 Dec 2009 12:49:35 +0000 http://blog.stodden.net/?p=144#comment-713 Any discussion of when, where, and how working scientists are going to learn to create this kind of material? Any discussion of when, where, and how working scientists are going to learn to create this kind of material?

]]>