<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Access to Knowledge 3: Opening Remarks</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.stodden.net/2008/09/08/access-to-knowledge-3-opening-remarks/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.stodden.net/2008/09/08/access-to-knowledge-3-opening-remarks/</link>
	<description>Just another WordPress weblog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 17 May 2010 01:59:26 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: links for 2009-11-13 &#171; Sameer Padania</title>
		<link>http://blog.stodden.net/2008/09/08/access-to-knowledge-3-opening-remarks/comment-page-1/#comment-274</link>
		<dc:creator>links for 2009-11-13 &#171; Sameer Padania</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 14 Nov 2009 07:02:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.stodden.net/2008/09/08/access-to-knowledge-3-opening-remarks/#comment-274</guid>
		<description>[...] Victoria Stodden on A2K3 conference &quot;Technical standards contain deep political stances on knowledge sharing and dissemination so the debate isn’t just about regulation any more.&quot; (tags: a2k technology exclusion regulation) [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Victoria Stodden on A2K3 conference &quot;Technical standards contain deep political stances on knowledge sharing and dissemination so the debate isn’t just about regulation any more.&quot; (tags: a2k technology exclusion regulation) [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Victoria Stodden</title>
		<link>http://blog.stodden.net/2008/09/08/access-to-knowledge-3-opening-remarks/comment-page-1/#comment-273</link>
		<dc:creator>Victoria Stodden</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Sep 2008 15:25:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.stodden.net/2008/09/08/access-to-knowledge-3-opening-remarks/#comment-273</guid>
		<description>[...] In the last A2K3 panel, entitled The Global Public Sphere: Media and Communication Rights, Seán Ó Siochrú made some striking statements based on his experience building local communication networks in undeveloped areas of LCDs. He states that the global public sphere is currently a myth, and what we have now is elites promoting their self-interest. He criticizes the very notion of the global public sphere - he wants a more dynamic and broader term that reflects the deeper issues involved in bringing about such a global public sphere. He prefers to frame this issue in terms of communication rights. By this he means the right to sek and receive ideas, generate ideas and opinions of one&#8217;s own, speaks these ideas, have a right to be heard, and a right to have others listen. These last two rights Ó Siochrú dismisses as trivial but I don&#8217;t see that they are. Each creates a demand on others&#8217; time that I don&#8217;t see how to effectuate within the framework of respect for individual automony Belkin elucidated in his keynote address and discussed in my recent blog post and on the A2K blog. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] In the last A2K3 panel, entitled The Global Public Sphere: Media and Communication Rights, Seán Ó Siochrú made some striking statements based on his experience building local communication networks in undeveloped areas of LCDs. He states that the global public sphere is currently a myth, and what we have now is elites promoting their self-interest. He criticizes the very notion of the global public sphere &#8211; he wants a more dynamic and broader term that reflects the deeper issues involved in bringing about such a global public sphere. He prefers to frame this issue in terms of communication rights. By this he means the right to sek and receive ideas, generate ideas and opinions of one&#8217;s own, speaks these ideas, have a right to be heard, and a right to have others listen. These last two rights Ó Siochrú dismisses as trivial but I don&#8217;t see that they are. Each creates a demand on others&#8217; time that I don&#8217;t see how to effectuate within the framework of respect for individual automony Belkin elucidated in his keynote address and discussed in my recent blog post and on the A2K blog. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: vcs</title>
		<link>http://blog.stodden.net/2008/09/08/access-to-knowledge-3-opening-remarks/comment-page-1/#comment-272</link>
		<dc:creator>vcs</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Sep 2008 07:34:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.stodden.net/2008/09/08/access-to-knowledge-3-opening-remarks/#comment-272</guid>
		<description>See also Lea Shaver&#039;s blog posts on the A2K3 site: http://a2k3.org/2008/09/opening-addresses/ and http://a2k3.org/2008/09/keynote-address-by-jack-balkin/</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>See also Lea Shaver&#8217;s blog posts on the A2K3 site: <a href="http://a2k3.org/2008/09/opening-addresses/" rel="nofollow">http://a2k3.org/2008/09/opening-addresses/</a> and <a href="http://a2k3.org/2008/09/keynote-address-by-jack-balkin/" rel="nofollow">http://a2k3.org/2008/09/keynote-address-by-jack-balkin/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
